• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Investors FastTrack

Quality Data for Investing Strategies

  • Solutions
    • Advisors
    • Individuals
    • Businesses
  • Product
    • Tools
    • Data
    • FT4WEB
  • Plans
    • Subscriptions
    • Customer Service
  • Resources
    • Download
    • Investing Math
    • FT Comm Manual
    • FT Cloud Manual
    • Videos
    • Data Status
  • About Us
  • Current Subscribers
  • (866) 295-0166

relative strength

Feb 22 2018

How to invest in Artificial Intelligence

artificial intelligence

There’s lots of buzz surrounding AI (artificial intelligence). It’s changing the world as we know it and also is showing strong out performance over the past year. Here’s a list of AI related names in the FastTrack database.

The charts below shows the relative strength chart vs SPY of the two most popular ETFs, BOTZ and HACK. BOTZ is showing nice strength vs SPY while HACK is mixed to losing steam. Do AI names have more room to run or have they given us all they’ve got?  Love to hear your comments.

BOTZ - Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
BOTZ vs SPY – 1 year Relative Strength (Feb 2017 to Feb 2018)
HACK - Pure ETF ISE Cyber Security
HACK vs SPY – 1 year Relative Strength (Feb 2017 to Feb 2018)

Artificial Intelligence
AIEQ – AI Powered Equity ETF
ARKQ – ARK Industrial Innovation ETF
BOTZ – Global Robotics & Artfcl Int’llgnc ETF
HACK – Pure ETF ISE Cyber Security
ROBO – ExTrd Concepts Robo Glbl Robotics&Autmtn
SOCL – Global X Mgnt ETF Social Media
TCHF – iShares ETF Edge MSCI Multifactor Techn
XT – iShares ETF Exponential Technologies
DTEC – ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF *
ROBT – First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence and Robotics ETF *
BUZ – BUZZ US Sentiment Leaders ETF *

* Well be added to FastTrack database by end of February 2018

Written by FT Cloud · Categorized: Data News, Strategy · Tagged: ai, relative strength

Oct 06 2015

New Families – Smart Beta

smart beta cube

Its hard to open a newspaper (or news app) these days and not see something about “smart beta,” “liquid alternative,” “strategic beta,” etc etc. There’s hot… Red hot right now. As such, we’ve created a FT Cloud family grouping for these funds. (see the instructions below to find the new family)

So, what is a smart beta ETF? Generally, its an ETF that weights its holdings by something other than market capitalization. They’re generally marketed as a hybrid between passive investing and active investing.

For example, RSP – Guggenheim S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF hold all companies in the S&P 500, but instead of market weighting the assets, RSP hold equal weights of all 500 assets.

Another good example is MTUM – iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF. It operates largely like the FT Cloud momentum model. The ETF holds approx 100-150 large and/or midcap stocks that have shown the highest 6 and 12 month total returns, then it market capitalization weights those funds for its final holdings. Its rebalances the holdings approximately once a quarter.

The smart beta segment is already big and its growing. According to FactSet there’s approx 450 strategic/smart beta ETFs currently in the market and there’s approx $450 billion invested. That’s up from 213 funds managing $132.5 billion in assets in 2009. FastTrack’s got 480 ETF (and some funds) that qualify as “smart beta” per our analysis. So, enjoy. Let us know what you think.

How to see the Smart Beta Family in FT Cloud:

First, sign into FT Cloud (sign up for a free trial here), click the FT Cloud tab, then press the “Load Family” button in the upper right corner.

smart beta load family

Next, expand the top tree level “Funds,” navigate to the bottom tree called “Smart Beta” and expand. Double click the families to load on the the right hand grid (press the load button to add to the spreadsheet)

smartbeta family selection

Also, to mix and match families, try using the sieve feature!

 

Written by FT Cloud · Categorized: Data News, Strategy · Tagged: etf, liquid alt, momentum, relative strength, smart beta, strategic beta

May 29 2014

New Strategy Video Out Today

We’ve got a great new strategy video that details how a simple 4 trades a year bond momentum model will vastly outperform a buy and hold bond strategy. Check it out here:  http://youtu.be/YzC49u4CPYU

Written by FT Cloud · Categorized: Strategy · Tagged: bond model, buy and hold, FBNDX, momentum, relative strength, risk vs return

Feb 26 2014

Use Momentum to Improve Investment Returns

Introduction

Investors FastTrack and FastTrack strategies have been around for a long time and have a great track record. For 25 years we’ve been training money managers and wealthy individuals how to increase returns and reduce volatility with FastTrack products. This paper discuses a typical investors profile (derived from the years of speaking with investors), the pitfalls of the typical investor, and how to FT Cloud+ can improve the typical investor’s portfolio.

Every Investor’s Goal: Increase returns and reduce risk. FT Cloud+ uses high quality data, processing power or our server and your computer to crunch the numbers and make achieving this goal simple and fast.

A picture speaks a thousand words… Over the past 10 years a typical investor has experienced major drawdowns and lower returns than the S&P 500. FT Cloud+ has produced a fraction of the drawdowns and retained the upside of a good investing strategy. Read more below to dig into the FT Cloud+ details.

top chart
Red Line: Typical Investor
Green Line: FT Cloud+
Grey Line: S&P 500

Profile of a Typical Investor

FastTrack has been is a nexus of money mangers and wealthy individuals for the past 25 years. We’ve spoken to thousands of different investors and its safe to say the profile below is extremely accurate.

The red line in the chart above is the average investor’s portfolio. The red line is a 60/20/20 portfolio. That’s 60% S&P 500, 20% long investment grade bonds,and 20% cash, then rebalanced to those allocations at the beginning of every year. We can see it’s not a strong strategy. Its highly correlated to the S&P (99.3%), produced a 37.3% draw down, and weighs in at approximately 1.25 percent less annualized return a year compared to buying and holding the S&P.

Every week we speak to investors that hold this portfolio and claim “diversity,” but have a portfolio substantially similar to the red line above. What does it take to break out of this rut? Below we’ll look at a strategy with 4 trades a year and holding the best 4 fund of diversified family. FT Cloud+ does the heavy lifting, all you do is pull the trigger.

Improve With FT Cloud+

Be More Active To Improve Returns (But No Need to Be To Active)

As the “typical investor” analysis above shows, buy and hold isn’t a great strategy. With FT Cloud+, we’re going to make 4 trades a year, and each trade we’ll rank our family of tickers by total return and guy the top 4 tickers in the list. Its very straight forward. And, its called the “Momentum Model” because when funds are trending up, we buy them. When funds are trending down, we sell them.

The green line in the chart above is the FT Cloud+ Momentum Strategy. Its a simple strategy with 4 trades a year and always hold 4 fund at approximately 1/4 of total assets each. The power of the FT Cloud+ model is which 4 funds you hold. FT Cloud+ chooses the funds based on momentum and relative strength. Its not a black box or a fancy algorithm. Every quarter FT Cloud+ ranks a group of funds (in the green line we ranked by total return), sorts by value, and buys the top 4 funds.

More Details

Here’s how FT Cloud+ uses momentum:

  • Step 1 – Choose a diversified list of funds you might possibly want to own. For this example we used 21 Vanguard mutual funds. The list of 21 (see entire list in appendix A) is a diversified mix of plain vanilla Vanguard funds. We’ve go equities, bonds, money market, international, and commodities.
  • Step 2 – At the end of every quarter we rank the 21 funds by total return for the prior month. So, this give us a ranking of the trailing 1 month.
  • Step 3 – Sell all positions in our portfolio. Sort our ranking with the highest total return at the top. Reinvest our assets evenly among the top 4 assets in our ranking.

Summary

It pays to be a more active investor and with FT Cloud+ doing all the hard work and heavy lifting, its a straight forward and painless process.

All our strategies are easy to understand and easy to execute. And best of all… they work. There’s no need to stick with strategies producing big drawdowns, high correlations, weak performance.

Visit http://www.investorsfasttrack.com today to sign up. Use promo code “MARCHFREE” to get your free trial of FT Cloud+.

Tickers in Family

  1. VUSTX – Vanguard INV:Long-Term US Treasury
  2. VWESX – Vanguard INV:Long-Term Investment Grade
  3. VMMXX – Vanguard INV:Money Market Prime
  4. VBMFX – Vanguard INV:Total Bond Market Index Fd
  5. VFIIX – Vanguard INV:GNMA
  6. VFSTX – Vanguard INV:Short-Term Investment Grade
  7. VWEHX – Vanguard INV:Hi-Yield Corporate
  8. VGHCX – Vanguard INV:Health Care
  9. VWINX – Vanguard INV:Wellesley Income
  10. VINEX – Vanguard INV:International Explorer
  11. VGENX – Vanguard INV:Energy
  12. VTRIX – Vanguard INV:International Value
  13. VEXPX – Vanguard INV:Explorer
  14. VWUSX – Vanguard INV:US Growth
  15. NAESX – Vanguard INV:SmallCap Index Fund
  16. VEXMX – Vanguard INV:Extended Market Index Fund
  17. VMRGX – Vanguard INV:Morgan Growth
  18. VGSTX – Vanguard INV:STAR
  19. VEIPX – Vanguard INV:Equity Income
  20. VQNPX – Vanguard INV:Growth & Income
  21. VFINX – Vanguard INV:S&P 500 Index Fund

Written by FT Cloud · Categorized: Strategy · Tagged: momentum, relative strength, simple strategy, vgfullterm

Nov 04 2013

FT Rebalance vs Accutrack

Abstract:

In this discussion we will set up two popular relative strength investing strategies: FT Rebalance momentum and FT4web AccuTrack. Then we will discuss advantages of multi-fund momentum trading with FT Rebalance compared to the two fund AccuTrack strategy.

2 strategies and the benchmark

Analysis

As stated in the abstract, we’ll be comparing the FT Rebalance momentum model and the FT4web AccuTrack model. First we need to lay out the two main differences in the strategies.

1)

FT Rebalance’s is an asset allocation strategy where FT4web AccuTrack is a market timing strategy.

In simple terms, FT Rebalance’s momentum strategy will reallocate assets every quarter (Jan 1, April 1, July 1, and Oct 1). So we have 4 trades a year at the end of each quarter.

FT4web AccuTrack model will trade based on signals generated by the AccuTrack technical indicator (ie when the red fund has more strength relative to the green line: invest in the red. When the green line has more strength relative to the red line: invest in the green.)

So, FT Rebalance will reallocate to the strongest assets on preset intervals (every quarter i.e. 4 trades a year). FT4web AccuTrack will reallocate intermittently when the relative strength of the two funds cross or switch.

2)

FT Rebalance will invest in the best of three funds (VFINX, VINEX, and VIIFX). FT4web AccuTrack will invest in the best of two funds (VFINX and VINEX).

AccuTrack: The two fund strategy

AccuTrack is a popular relative strength trading strategy used by many FastTrackers. In FT4web, AccuTrack and the J chart will trade between two funds based on relative strength (find more info on AccuTrack here).

A standard relative strength strategy could be trading between a domestic fund (VFINX) and an international fund (VINEX).

FT4web screen cap
FT4web screen cap
10 year chart

In the chart above we see that the two fund model worked great during the first five years (7/2003-7/2007) with an annualized gain of 28.95%. But when the market began to turn sour in late 2007 the two fund strategy shows its major weakness: no diversity. Both international and domestic markets took a hit and as a result this strategy lost an annualized 22.10% from 7/2007 – 7/2009.

While the strategy recovered in late 2009 returning an annualized 18.21% from 7/2009 to 7/2013, the 10 years between 7/2003- 7/2013 was a quite a ride. As we see in the first chart in the post (pink line), the strategy had a max draw of 60.28 percent and an standard deviation of 5.8% (just less than the 5.94% of the S&P 500 for the same period).

FT Rebalance Momentum: Best of three funds

In the simple model illustrated below, instead of using a relative analysis of two funds, VFINX and VINEX, we added one more fund VFIIX (Vanguard GNMA) to the mix. VFIIX adds a conservative risk and low correlation fund element to our strategy.

Now, instead of moving our assets to the best of two funds, we will move our assets to the best of three funds.

accu3-stats
Red=FT Rebalance Pink=FT4web J Chart Black=S&P 500
10 year chart

As we can see in the red line above, adding one more fund to the relative analysis greatly improves long-term performance of the strategy, mainly by giving us a conservative asset like VFIIX to retreat to in down markets (all of 2008, 3Q10, 3Q11).

If we look at the period between 7/2007 and 7/2009 we have a positive annualized return of 2.22%, compared to a -22.10% return of the FT4web AccuTrack model for the same time period.

The lack of diversity hurt the AccuTrack model, as it could only choose between the VFINX and VINEX, both of which were declining in during 7/2007-7/2009. In contrast, having VFIIX as an option in the FT Rebalance momentum model, we can see that the red line smooths out during 7/2007-7/2009 as the model moves to VFIIX.

Summary

This is a very simple illustration of two different relative strength models. As the above analysis shows, incorporating more diversity (three funds vs two) into a strategy can have a strong positive impact, especially on limiting downside risk.

Additionally, we’ve seen a simple strategy that makes 4 trades a year with index style funds can have incredible results.

The next step after this would be to create a family with more than three members. Try 4, 5, or 6 well chosen, diversified funds. Also, try increasing the # to buy to 2, 3, or 4. This will increase your total number of funds held, which could temper volatility. Or, try using the sharpe model to limit the drawdowns.

Leave a comment below or email daniel@fasttrack.net with any questions

FT Rebalance Model Setup

Family:
VFINX- Vanguard S&P 500 Index Fund
VFIIX- Vanguard GNMA,
VINEX- Vanguard International Explorer
Parameters:
rebalparams
Date Range:
7/11/2003 – 7/11/2013
FT Rebalance Build:
1.5.0.8

Written by FT Cloud · Categorized: Strategy · Tagged: accutrack, ft4web, relative strength, simple strategy

Footer

Contact Us

Investors FastTrack
(866) 295-0166

Investors FastTrack © 2025